
Julie Daydreaming, Berthe Morisot, 1894.
The Newlyweds
The warrant in Sessions Court
was filed to replevin some clothes. Present at the mediation were: the
plaintiff, a young white woman in her late teens; the defendant, an older black
woman; the plaintiff's mother; and two CMC co-mediators. When asked to
tell why she filed the suit and what the problem was, the plaintiff meekly
replied that she lived in the defendant's house for awhile and when she left,
the defendant refused to allow her to take any of her clothes or belongings.
The defendant was angry, very
angry. Yes, she had the clothes, but said, "Let me tell you what this is
really all about." The plaintiff had been dating the defendant's son; she
had become pregnant and they had subsequently married. The plaintiff's
parents threw her out of the house because she'd become pregnant out of wedlock
with a black man. The son and the plaintiff then asked if they could live
with defendant. She told them that her house wasn't big enough and that
they were a family and needed to find a home of their own. Until they did
so, defendant invited them to stay with her temporarily, provided they could pay
$50 toward the grocery bill. Plaintiff stayed three months.
Defendant reported that plaintiff never cleaned up, never cooked, never bought
groceries. Her son used to be a good son, but since his marriage, he never
stayed home. He left early and came home late. The plaintiff had
caused this awful change in her son. The defendant's position was thus:
before plaintiff could retrieve her clothes, she must clean up her room so that
it was as neat as when she moved in, and she must pay $150.
When it was her turn to
respond, plaintiff broke into sobs. She said that when she'd gotten
pregnant, not only had her parents thrown her out, she'd had to quit her job.
The entire time she'd lived at defendant's home, she had morning sickness.
She ate practically nothing and didn't have the energy to do any cleaning.
Her husband was working two jobs to support them, and it was still a struggle to
make ends meet. They hadn't even bought anything for the baby; they
absolutely couldn't afford to pay the defendant anything.
Very often, non-party
witnesses are not given an opportunity to contribute to a mediation. But
it became clear in this case that plaintiff's mother was as deep into the
dispute as any of the others. She was glad to meet the other grandmother
for the first time. She said that she and her husband had not, in fact,
thrown her daughter out of the house. They'd respected her choice of a
husband and welcomed him into their family. They live in a one-bedroom
apartment in public housing and couldn't provide the newlyweds with a place to
stay. Yes, her daughter had been sick during her pregnancy; why, the
grandmother had been sick too, with all three of her pregnancies--like mother,
like daughter. She certainly knew how her daughter felt, but that was no
excuse for shirking her household chores. The plaintiff's mother would
clean defendant's apartment herself, and would pay the $150 if she had it; but
she didn't.
So the defendant's offer to
settle involved paying the money and cleaning up the bedroom. The
mediators asked if the plaintiff could pay anything over time. She didn't
have any money and had no prospects. They then asked the defendant if she
would be satisfied with a clean room only? Yes, and the case settled.
During the course of the
mediation, the two grandmothers seemed to come together. Neither had
contemplated nor welcomed an inter-racial, cross-cultural marriage, but their
adult children had made that decision and were working hard to make the best of
the situation. They would need all the help they could get, and by the end
of the mediation, the grandmothers were committed to giving love, respect and
common sense advice.